The economic evaluations and the real estate appraisals for the effectiveness, feasibility and sustainability of urban regeneration measures
The urban policies and territorial live a period of profound transformation, characterized by a shift to new approaches and governance tools. Public intervention implemented through programs active an application for assessment: beyond the explicit applications contained in the various intervention tools, the decision-making sphere, facing the loss of representativeness of organized politics and the growing complexity of the variables that influence the public choices has the absolute necessity of auxiliary tools that allow you to optimize the use of available resources and at the same time make the decision-making path shareable and transparent. Fewer resources always available, the importance of the time during transformation processes, the rational legitimacy of choices - pose a number of difficult problems to solve that lead to the need to experiment with new tools to support decision makers, from the early stage of planning or in the pre-design phase (Saaty, 1990; 2008).
In this valuation context of compatible functional solutions, the Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodologies (Roy & Bouyssou, 1993), and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in particular, play a significant role as they allow to be taken into account all the intrinsic values of the assets in question, both economic and extra-economic. The use of these methods can provide choices that are not always based on the best cost-benefit ratio (NesticÃ², Macchiaroli, & Pipolo, 2015).Â
As well as guaranteeing the presence and the clarification of different values, the formalisation of an evaluation process carried out in these terms, expression of the community needs, also allows the control and the correspondence between general and specific choices. Since the asset is of particular value, it is, however, necessary that the various criteria and weights taken on the basis of the evaluation are shared by the community or rather, by direct users and by potential or future users.
CalabrÃ², F., & Della Spina, L. (2014a). Innovative Tools for the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Administrative Action of the Metropolitan Cities: the Strategic Operational Programme. In: 1th international Symposium New Metropolitan Perspectives - The Integrated Approach of Urban Sustainable Development (ISTH2020). Advanced Engineering Forum Vol. 11 (2014) pp 3-10. Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications.
CalabrÃ², F., & Della Spina, L. (2014b). The public-private partnerships in buildings regeneration: a model appraisal of the benefits and for land value capture. Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 931- 932 pp 555-559 Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications.
CalabrÃ², F., & Della Spina, L. (2013). The Cultural and Environmental Resources for Sustainable Development of Rural Areas in Economically Disadvantaged Contexts-Economic-Appraisals Issues of a Model of Management for the Valorization of Public Assets. Advanced Materials Research, 869, 43-48. Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications.
Cassalia, G. (2014). Assessing Heritage Significance: Decision Support tools for Managing Landscapeâ€™s Cultural Value in Southern Italy. Advanced Engineering Forum Vol. 11, Trnas Tech Publications, Switzerland pp. 647-652, doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.11.647.
Della Spina L., et al.. (2015). Urban renewal: negotiation procedures and evaluation models Â© Springer International Publishing Switzerland. O. Gervasi et al. (eds.): ICCSA 2015, Part III, LNCS 9157, pp. 88â€“103, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21470-2_7 In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA 2015)
Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys (Vol. 78). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
NesticÃ², A., & Pipolo, O., (2015) A protocol for sustainable building interventions: financial analysis and environmental effects. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 199-212. Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., GenÃ¨ve, Switzerland.
Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & management, 42(1), 15-29. Switzerland, Springer International Publishing.
Roy, B., & Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritÃ©re Ã la dÃ©cision: MÃ©thodes et Cas. Paris: Economica.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). Decision making for leaders: the Analytic Hierarchy Process for decisions in a complex world. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Internal Journal of Services Sciences, 1, 83-98.
DOI (Calabro, Della Spina - Paper): http://dx.doi.org/10.21625/essd.v1i1.19.g6
Copyright (c) 2016 International Journal of Environmental Science & Sustainable Development.